Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Energy Secretary Wright says U.S. 'not ready' to escort tankers through Strait of Hormuz yet [View all]
Bluetus
(2,669 posts)36. Exactly. And Trump is saying taxpayers will provide reinsurance to
the likes of Lloyds of London. Remind me, when did Congress appropriate money for us to be an insurance company.
As you imply, nobody is taking a tanker through the Strait without insurance. Having a Hegseth escort is not the same thing as insurance.
And any shipping companies should keep in mind, Trump never pays his bills. Never has. If your tanker gets hit, you are on your own.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
48 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Energy Secretary Wright says U.S. 'not ready' to escort tankers through Strait of Hormuz yet [View all]
BumRushDaShow
Yesterday
OP
Enough unless the Iranians launch a mass drone swarm and the ship runs out of ammunition before the
flashman13
20 hrs ago
#12
Wait another week or two other countries wil be stepping into escort their own tankers
EX500rider
20 hrs ago
#14
No they won't. The military situation is the same for everyone. Iran owns the Straits of Hormuz.
flashman13
19 hrs ago
#20
There are two possibilities here. They have already cut a deal with Iran or their ships will be sunk.
flashman13
17 hrs ago
#31
"The reality is that none of those 76 destroyers are available." They can be.
EX500rider
18 hrs ago
#24
So your answer is to provide more targets. Numbers and brute force can not negate the defensive
flashman13
16 hrs ago
#37
They can also create distance at the narrowst place the straight is 21 Mi wide but the channel runs down the middle
EX500rider
16 hrs ago
#38
This was posted earlier by someone else but it's an amazing watch, 32 minutes long
wolfie001
Yesterday
#4
Well, the lack of shipping right now is an indication of a breakdown somewhere in the defense chain
wolfie001
18 hrs ago
#27
The US destroyer and mine sweeper vessels will take some time to get there from all around the globe
EX500rider
17 hrs ago
#28
They say Trump is playing chess and he's six moves ahead of us. (illustrated)
usonian
18 hrs ago
#26
When Donald is long gone, buried beneath the 18th hole somewhere, the Stooges will claim the spoils as rulers.
usonian
17 hrs ago
#35
You would need a 250,000 troop invasion of the Iranian side of the Strait
Prairie Gates
23 hrs ago
#7
It's not that they're busy as much as they haven't quite figured out how much to charge per transit...
EarthFirst
20 hrs ago
#11
I call them sitting ducks because the is very little room for mobility and they are close to land on both sides.
Martin68
12 hrs ago
#44
If you destroy "the manufacturing industry that supplies their offensive capabilities"
bucolic_frolic
17 hrs ago
#29
Encouraging vessels to just go for it is insane. But that's where we are under Orange Julius. n/t
Evolve Dammit
14 hrs ago
#42