Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: More Than 60,000 Washington Post Customers Canceled Subscriptions After Jeff Bezos Axed 44% of Reporters [View all]OldBaldy1701E
(11,018 posts)36. Yes, they do.
But, they won't offer one cent of their own wealth to save anything that they decide is not worth their time, irregardless of the common good that comes from said item.
So, they will just close it down.
What do the rich lose? Nothing. They set things up that way. No personal risk and no personal loss. Those are for losers.
The rest of us lose everything. But, we still worship the ground they walk on. Even as they destroy everything just to keep from parting with one coin.

Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
38 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
More Than 60,000 Washington Post Customers Canceled Subscriptions After Jeff Bezos Axed 44% of Reporters [View all]
BumRushDaShow
Yesterday
OP
The only thing I have on that list is Paramount + which will be toast in August
Bengus81
Yesterday
#19
They rely on advertisers to keep the paper in the black. Subscribers leave and so do
Bengus81
Yesterday
#24
60k sounds like a big loss, but the total number of digital subscribers to WaPo is 2.5M.
TheRickles
Yesterday
#10
This is how the NYT framed it (the piece is a lengthy long-form thing that is typical of something in the magazine)
BumRushDaShow
Yesterday
#14
Interesting snip about the content's context- thanks. But still no numerical context by the Times.
TheRickles
Yesterday
#15
That's when I canceled , but it took 6 months to actually stop since I had paid for a year
fargone
Yesterday
#31
As someone who worked in corporate management for years, you cannot cut your way to profitability.
Lonestarblue
Yesterday
#17
I worked for a company like that; cutting support staff produced worse cust svc
Callie1979
Yesterday
#20
I dropped it when he BOUGHT it. And I've NEVER used Amazon. How many DUeers have stopped?
Callie1979
Yesterday
#18
Not enough people are willing to pay for internet content when the mindset is that it should all be "free"
MichMan
Yesterday
#23
I cancelled my WaPo subscription after he blocked their endorsement of Kamala
NEOBuckeye
Yesterday
#32
I wish they would approach it like cable tv and offer a couple dozen or so news options
travelingthrulife
5 hrs ago
#38