Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LearnedHand

(5,397 posts)
1. Not saying this isn't serious
Wed Mar 18, 2026, 11:41 PM
10 hrs ago

But 93GB is not a huge trove of data, and it’s an odd number that seems out of character for “big” hacks. This is less than 1/5 the capacity of a standard internal hard drive. It’s sort of not reflective of a crucial, active database, where you’re more likely to hear about hundreds of gigabytes or even terabytes being exfiltrated. That having been said, the importance of the content may not be reflected in the size of the data.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Hacker says they compromi...»Reply #1