Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Kid Berwyn

(24,245 posts)
13. Really.
Fri Mar 20, 2026, 09:47 AM
7 hrs ago

Isn’t a spat more of an argument?

I thought what the traitor had done was closer to starting an illegal, immoral, disastrous and completely unnecessary war of apocalyptic proportions to divert attention from his long and criminal association with the late Jeffrey Epstein.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Sure... just stop bombing & pay Iran reparations and the problem is solved Tim S Yesterday #1
NO!!!!!!! DON'T CAVE TO THE ORANGE BASTARD. groundloop Yesterday #2
This guy is delusional Miguelito Loveless 23 hrs ago #3
He's saying the right words to help calm the situation. maxsolomon 23 hrs ago #4
Acting as though US actions Miguelito Loveless 22 hrs ago #6
OK, well his job is to keep NATO functioning. maxsolomon 21 hrs ago #7
The.normalization Miguelito Loveless 19 hrs ago #9
LNG OC375 23 hrs ago #5
Many weasel words in those two sentences. Marcuse 20 hrs ago #8
yup Skittles 19 hrs ago #10
Spat? Harker 9 hrs ago #11
Really. Kid Berwyn 7 hrs ago #13
Yes, a spat is a petty little quarrel. Harker 6 hrs ago #14
A criminal war started by a criminal. Kid Berwyn 6 hrs ago #15
I thought the "spat" was over. Trump asked NATO to participate in his illegal war. Ray Bruns 9 hrs ago #12
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»NATO chief confident spat...»Reply #13