Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This seems like a really stupid idea. Ocelot II Friday #1
It is a really stupid idea sarisataka Friday #13
What could possibly go wrong? tanyev Friday #2
Answer: Everything! flashman13 Friday #3
So the braintrust is assuming Iran won't fire on it because the oil/storage? underpants Friday #4
Depends how stupid Iran is EX500rider Friday #5
Wouldn't Iran lose those facilities anyway? EYESORE 9001 Friday #8
Big difference between temporarily occupied and destroyed EX500rider Friday #11
Define 'temporary' EYESORE 9001 Friday #14
For them, it might as well be destroyed if it is occupied any real length of time SamuelTheThird Friday #18
Well the facilities require oil to be pumped from the wells to there.. EX500rider Friday #22
The Dutch destroyed their refineries rather than have them used by Japan in WWII. PufPuf23 Friday #39
If the facility is occupied .... reACTIONary Friday #12
No one else can use it with out Iran continuing to pump oil there from the well heads. EX500rider Friday #23
Iran is prepared to take everyone in the Gulf Miguelito Loveless Friday #17
This could lead to worldwide nuclear war SamuelTheThird Friday #19
This is the path Miguelito Loveless Friday #20
"Iran is prepared to take everyone in the Gulf.." Even more reason they can't be trusted with nukes IMO EX500rider Friday #24
They don't have any nukes Miguelito Loveless Friday #27
So they ruined their economy with sanctions & have thousands of centrifuges under a mountain.. EX500rider Friday #30
Something Israel claims Miguelito Loveless Friday #36
They don't have nukes & working on getting them are 2 different things. EX500rider Friday #31
Again, the claim is they have been working on them for 47 years Miguelito Loveless Friday #34
And again why do they have centrifuges under a mountain enriching uranium to nuclear bomb percentages? EX500rider Friday #35
Again, proof other than Israeli Miguelito Loveless Friday #37
That's the UN saying that not Trump or Israel EX500rider Friday #38
Iran cannot win the war by strength and may end up a larger version of Gaza and a failed state. PufPuf23 Friday #40
"Israel cannot be trusted with nuclear weapons." The facts would indicate otherwise IMO EX500rider Friday #41
I don't trust Israel with nukes much more than I trust Iran--- BUT Jack Valentino Friday #43
Because Iran "holds all of the good cards" Trump can't just declare victory and walk out. flashman13 Friday #6
Do trump and Kegbreath ever consult any actual military experts? Bayard Friday #7
Trump wants a blood sacrifice. Baitball Blogger Friday #9
they should have considered it before now. maxsolomon Friday #10
Why won't Iran want to damage the petro Farmer-Rick Friday #26
because they are self-interested. maxsolomon Friday #29
The Iranian army has the whole fucking island zeroed for motherfucking artillery missions. SoFlaBro Friday #15
Be out of range for most their artillery @ 25 miles+ unless they line it up exposed on the beach EX500rider Friday #25
Why would they stop attacking the rest of the ME? Red Mountain Friday #32
Well the issue for them is that's where 90% of the oil leaves from EX500rider Friday #33
Let's see: Miguelito Loveless Friday #16
Its way west of the strait IbogaProject Friday #21
Been obvious for a while now OC375 Friday #28
US speeds up deployment of thousands more Marines, sailors to Middle East Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Friday #42
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»US considering occupying ...»Reply #1