Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: U.S. payrolls rose by 178,000 in March, more than expected; unemployment at 4.3% [View all]lapfog_1
(31,907 posts)2. do not trust anything from the BLS
Trump has replaced people there with his toadies.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
14 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
64 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
U.S. payrolls rose by 178,000 in March, more than expected; unemployment at 4.3% [View all]
BumRushDaShow
Friday
OP
The revisions coming for this number will hopefully reflect some sort of reality.
NoMoreRepugs
Friday
#1
(revised title) It was revised down, yes, but to 116k - which is their very latest
progree
Friday
#60
Yes, they are all catastrophically horrible numbers, being that they are totals for AN ENTIRE YEAR. /nt
progree
Friday
#62
You read what the former head of the BLS said? She didn't seem to be so gung-ho
wolfie001
Friday
#53
Most any day in the "news" they report lay-offs in the tens-of-thousands. Hmmm.
twodogsbarking
Friday
#8
I get this message: This story is available exclusively to Business Insider subscribers.
Wiz Imp
Friday
#26
Here's the msn no-paywall republication of it (at least part of it, omitting the actual breakdown of companies) -
BumRushDaShow
Friday
#36
Thanks. As expected, these layoff announcements are not inconsistent with the BLS data.
Wiz Imp
Friday
#41
And I explained how the jobs data just released are not inconsistent with those layoff announcements.
Wiz Imp
Friday
#28
For those who are so sure these numbers are fake, then why would the administration
Wiz Imp
Friday
#12
The numbers are seasonally adjusted, so they account and adjust for normal seasonal fluctuations
progree
Friday
#43
"a drop of 133,000 jobs in February? And February's number was even revised downward significantly."
BumRushDaShow
Friday
#29
I had never noticed the mislabeling of the CNBC graphs before, OMG! Here's both sets of numbers, and ADP
progree
Friday
#47
How are we supposed to believe any numbers coming out of this administration, give wrong numbers and you get fired.
Walleye
Friday
#33
Total BS. The career statisticians who produce the numbers at BLS have not been fired. Not a single one of them.
Wiz Imp
Friday
#35
Let me guess... the heavy lifter here is "healthcare", hmm? Nursing homes and the like, right?
Scott Alan Swaggerty
Friday
#45
There are government jobs available. You must be willing to work nights and week-ends and
twodogsbarking
Friday
#46
Quite a few mistakes in this media opinion piece as often happens, though one key number was a LOT worse than it said:
progree
Friday
#55
Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell today: "There is effectively zero net job creation in the private sector."
LetMyPeopleVote
17 hrs ago
#63