Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LetMyPeopleVote

(182,024 posts)
29. Trump Can't Be on Both Sides of IRS Settlement, Democrats Say
Mon May 18, 2026, 02:23 PM
Yesterday

Since trump is on both sides of this "lawsuit", the courts have no jurisdiction. There can be no settlement if there was no real lawsuit in the first place.



https://news.bloombergtax.com/daily-tax-report/trump-cant-be-on-both-sides-of-irs-settlement-democrats-say

Democrats asked a court to block a reported settlement between the IRS and President Donald Trump over a leak of his tax information during his first term, saying it lacks the bare minimum required to file a lawsuit: two opposing parties.

Nearly 100 House Democrats signed an amicus brief in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida on Monday that says the case doesn’t distinguish between Trump as president and “personal capacity.” The brief also demands the court dismiss the lawsuit as unconstitutional. It sets another marker on how Democrats are finding fresh opportunities to highlight their opposition to how Trump’s personally benefiting from being president.

Trump moved toward dropping his $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS over the 2019 leak of his tax information in a court filing Monday morning. The Department of Justice announced the creation of a $1.7 billion federal fund to pay victims of so-called government weaponization to resolve the lawsuit, under which Trump wouldn’t receive any money directly.

“The President has repeatedly claimed far-reaching Executive power and frequently sought to use that power to further his own personal interests,” the brief said. “He cannot pretend that officials at the IRS and the Department of the Treasury—and their lawyers at the DOJ—operate independently from him for purposes of this case.”....

The Democrats’ filing is being handled by a task force led by top House Democrat leaders Joe Neguse (D-Colo.) and Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.), along with House Judiciary Committee ranking member Jamie Raskin and House Ways and Means Committee ranking member Richard Neal (D-Mass.).

We urge the Court to dismiss this ludicrous case for lack of jurisdiction and to block any settlement that would turn the Treasury into a vehicle for corrupt self-dealing in violation of the Constitution and Congress’s exclusive power of the purse,” Raskin said in a statement announcing the amicus brief.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

whiskey tango alpha foxtrot keroro gunsou Yesterday #1
So, not only did he incite these criminals to johnnyfins Yesterday #2
Let the lawsuits commence..... Lovie777 Yesterday #3
It should take at least as long for Trump to get his $1.7B as it'll take E. Jean Carroll to receive her money. sop Yesterday #17
I love how this has galvanized the Resistance. Kid Berwyn Yesterday #4
"Where are our leaders? Not voicing ANYTHING makes voters think "It's OK."" BumRushDaShow Yesterday #7
Thanks for the links! Kid Berwyn Yesterday #9
He is the Ranking Member of the House Judiciary Committee BumRushDaShow Yesterday #26
Oh, I think she's TOPS! I supported Sen. Warren for President. Twice. Kid Berwyn Yesterday #27
I'm Sure That... GB_RN Yesterday #5
And where is this money going to come from? Doesn't Congress have to approve something like this? Ray Bruns Yesterday #6
Hopefully this can be challenged in Court and blocked. cstanleytech Yesterday #8
MaddowBlog-Trump moves to withdraw $10 billion lawsuit against IRS amid reports of new 'slush fund' LetMyPeopleVote Yesterday #10
Well lookie there UpInArms Yesterday #11
"Crisis Actors" Kid Berwyn Yesterday #16
I didn't think I could despise these people any more than I already do. NoSheep Yesterday #12
Dems have got to vocally respond to this outrage and fight it tooth and nail. We know the GOP D. Spaulding Yesterday #13
How to define the "class" to exclude us? Tben Yesterday #28
Wow! Trump is really a master dealmaker; he negotiated himself down from $10B to $1.7B, saving us $8.3B. sop Yesterday #14
Here is the DOJ release on this "settlement" LetMyPeopleVote Yesterday #15
Funny how the DOJ is under the control of TFG's personal attorney UpInArms Yesterday #18
The danger here cannot be overstated. orangecrush Yesterday #20
We are now officially a kleptocracy orangecrush Yesterday #19
What a batch of BULSHIT............. republianmushroom Yesterday #21
Yup as essentially he ordered his employees to give him taxpayer money. cstanleytech Yesterday #22
Traitor payments CanonRay Yesterday #23
Somehow, get on record everyone that allows this BULLSHIT to happen. bluestarone Yesterday #24
He claims Biden weaponized the justice department ? What does he call his persecution of Comey, Brennan for doing ChicagoTeamster Yesterday #25
Trump Can't Be on Both Sides of IRS Settlement, Democrats Say LetMyPeopleVote Yesterday #29
Both men in charge at the IRS and the DOJ are "acting heads," neither have been confirmed, and both are Trump stooges. sop 23 hrs ago #32
If that's what this fund truly is, then Democrats that the DOJ attacked at the behest of Trump should get their share. patphil Yesterday #30
This is an OUTRAGE! EndlessMaze Yesterday #31
From a fellow CONVICT! dickthegrouch 22 hrs ago #33
Only in Trumps USA!!-Taxpayers paying Rioters who hurt our Capitol police and damaged the Capitol!! riversedge 22 hrs ago #34
Does the DOJ have a fat bank account? CoopersDad 21 hrs ago #35
Did I tell y'all about my friend who lost his job? He was an administrator of a company that employed Scrivener7 20 hrs ago #36
Judge is taking the position that the lawsuit does not include any settlement LetMyPeopleVote 18 hrs ago #37
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Justice Department announ...»Reply #29