Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

relogic

(274 posts)

9. NDA for thee but not for me

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue May 26, 2026, 01:10 PM

Yesterday

Their concern for leaks, vetting, security clearances and all the rest is insincere. They appoint a son-in-law to negotiate Middle East policy who is on the take for 2 billion (that we know of). We have in place a NSA and FBI that are infiltrated to the extent that this fascist regime has no credibility or intent to guard against anything undemocratic. Their opposition is predictably an agenda of blatant leaking, unsecured personnel and hyperbolic threats of insecurity-a self-own.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

NEOH calimary dave99

30 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trump administration proposes NDAs for all federal workers [View all] BumRushDaShow Yesterday OP

"Never rat on your friends, and always keep your mouth shut ..." pat_k Yesterday #1

No. travelingthrulife Yesterday #2

Part of having a clearance Jerry2144 Yesterday #3

Of course it has nothing to do with non-disclosure of classified information pat_k Yesterday #29

Trump transparency is OPAQUE. bucolic_frolic Yesterday #4

At best (eom) AZLD4Candidate Yesterday #21

What about the leaks from 1600 Pa and the Pentegon's chats? Historic NY Yesterday #5

So he wants to treat federal workers as though they're Stormy Daniels? RedWhiteBlueIsRacist Yesterday #6

Not just NO UpInArms Yesterday #7

It's unnecessary because each position is already classified with some "sensitivity" level BumRushDaShow Yesterday #8

NDA for thee but not for me relogic Yesterday #9

Fool, they don't work for you. They work for US. GFY. n/t TygrBright Yesterday #10

Not enforceable Aviation Pro Yesterday #11

Better idea I think they should all wear body cameras ToxMarz Yesterday #12

Somebody please remind Chump that these people aren't HIS EMPLOYEES FakeNoose Yesterday #13

NDAs are not enforcable for illegal acts. Blue Full Moon Yesterday #14

I love that, thank you! mahina Yesterday #16

There are no such 'thing' as 'laws' for the gangster-in-chief. Justice matters. Yesterday #23

He's using NDAs as a way to silence whistleblowers. YodaMom2 Yesterday #15

It is already illegal for any federal worker to share any confidential government information Wiz Imp Yesterday #17

When someone is mobbed up dlk Yesterday #18

Unconstitutional on its face and violates federal employee contracts. Ford_Prefect Yesterday #19

Wasn't the "leak" about Venezuela from Figarosmom Yesterday #20

What is going to happen when Bozo and his baby-Bozos shoot their mouths off or intentionally leak shit? Scalded Nun Yesterday #22

We. already do an SF312 for access to classified... COL Mustard Yesterday #24

Sounds like he's trying to expand the definition of "confidential information." Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Yesterday #25

This is redundant and pointless Johonny Yesterday #26

NDA's are un-American, especially in the government Walleye Yesterday #27

Well, he did promise he was going to run the country they way he has run his businesses. Texin Yesterday #28

Likely part and parcel of installing election deniers, corrupting CISA, and... pat_k Yesterday #30