Latest Breaking News

sop

(19,738 posts)

3. "The framework is aimed at providing Iran the ability to sell it politically to their internal audience." Really?

Wed Jun 17, 2026, 07:24 AM

Yesterday

They're saying Iran's leaders are worried about selling this agreement politically to their internal audience, but didn't Trump tell us Iran's leaders are a bunch of murderous thugs who won't allow political protests, that Iran isn't a democracy, and it doesn't allow any internal political opposition? It seems the only one worried about selling this agreement politically to an internal audience is Trump.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

12 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

thesquanderer oberle KS Toronado NoMoreRepugs 70sEraVet raging moderate Multichromatic mtairyguy bleedingulcers YodaMom2 CharleyDog reACTIONary

40 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

US officials downplay text of the Iran agreement, saying it doesn't account for back-channel commitments [View all] BumRushDaShow Yesterday OP

Pay-offs for the fat orange imbecile wolfie001 Yesterday #1

I'm pretty sure a few countries in the Middle East are very uneasy................ Lovie777 Yesterday #2

I mean, they're on the hook for $300 billion and have a full-fledged economic competitor Prairie Gates Yesterday #12

"The framework is aimed at providing Iran the ability to sell it politically to their internal audience." Really? sop Yesterday #3

More like Trump is trying to sell it to his internal audience. Baitball Blogger Yesterday #5

Projection. They're trying to spin it for people here. ananda Yesterday #9

Whipping our butts will not be hard to sell to the Iranian public. mahina 11 hrs ago #40

Back channel commitments. Baitball Blogger Yesterday #4

.... yardwork Yesterday #6

So, all that for stock options? OldBaldy1701E Yesterday #7

" aimed at providing Iran the ability to sell it politically" Strelnikov_ Yesterday #8

It's giving secret girlfriend in NIagara Falls Prairie Gates Yesterday #10

In my honest opinion, Mtnmama Yesterday #11

I.O.W.s The agreement gives Iran everything it wanted and 300 billion in reparations for Trump's war ... Botany 23 hrs ago #13

It is not "reparations". It is a "private investment fund". AloeVera 22 hrs ago #20

I might be wrong but @ the end of day the U.S. taxpayers will be on the hook for paying for Trump's war. Botany 22 hrs ago #21

Of course they are. One of the many, many reasons to not rush into an unnecessary, trumped-up war of choice. AloeVera 21 hrs ago #25

Another worthless document from the dumpie administration. KS Toronado 23 hrs ago #14

Back channel commitments?All that matters is what is actually signed,and with Trump,half the time even that won't matter thesquanderer 23 hrs ago #15

Everything Trump for 10+ years has gotten us to this point where NoMoreRepugs 23 hrs ago #16

Backchannel commitments for what? The rebuilding business deals that Trump wants the bribe money to be spent on? ChicagoTeamster 22 hrs ago #17

Maybe they're trying to figure out ways to WestMichRad 21 hrs ago #26

Which is why they wanted to delay releasing the text until at least Friday.. SamuelAdams 22 hrs ago #18

It was a birthday party favor for the man-child... Hugin 22 hrs ago #19

Ah, Yessss; The Old "Back-Channel Commitments" Trick..... ColoringFool 22 hrs ago #22

A "political document" only existing as a birthday present for the loser in the white house. travelingthrulife 22 hrs ago #23

$300,000,000,000 is still $300,000,000,000. paulkienitz 21 hrs ago #24

Per "back-channel agreements" it is probably 500 billion (classified for purposes of National Security) pat_k 19 hrs ago #32

Trump and his war-mongering assholes are desperate agingdem 21 hrs ago #27

I'm surprised they're not communicating in "pig latin". Buddyzbuddy 20 hrs ago #28

Maybe Dotard tore up the original agreement because he didn't know about its maxsolomon 20 hrs ago #29

TACO !! republianmushroom 20 hrs ago #30

Of course, any back-channel agreements are WORSE. pat_k 19 hrs ago #31

Ooh backchannel commitments Johnny2X2X 19 hrs ago #33

They're just words. Nothing to see here. Scalded Nun 18 hrs ago #34

Translation: the memorandum isn't worth the paper it's printed on. patphil 18 hrs ago #35

Give me a break. City Lights 17 hrs ago #36

LOL! Did Dean Wormer put Iran on double-secret probation? Mysterian 15 hrs ago #37

Is a back channel agreement , one that goes straight up my ass? 3Hotdogs 13 hrs ago #38

There is an essential rule of law. TomSlick 11 hrs ago #39