Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ChicagoTeamster

(1,440 posts)
17. Backchannel commitments for what? The rebuilding business deals that Trump wants the bribe money to be spent on?
Wed Jun 17, 2026, 09:28 AM
Wednesday

You know he'll probably either be taking bribes for that or give the contracts to political donors.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Pay-offs for the fat orange imbecile wolfie001 Wednesday #1
I'm pretty sure a few countries in the Middle East are very uneasy................ Lovie777 Wednesday #2
I mean, they're on the hook for $300 billion and have a full-fledged economic competitor Prairie Gates Wednesday #12
"The framework is aimed at providing Iran the ability to sell it politically to their internal audience." Really? sop Wednesday #3
More like Trump is trying to sell it to his internal audience. Baitball Blogger Wednesday #5
Projection. They're trying to spin it for people here. ananda Wednesday #9
Whipping our butts will not be hard to sell to the Iranian public. mahina Wednesday #40
Back channel commitments. Baitball Blogger Wednesday #4
.... yardwork Wednesday #6
So, all that for stock options? OldBaldy1701E Wednesday #7
" aimed at providing Iran the ability to sell it politically" Strelnikov_ Wednesday #8
It's giving secret girlfriend in NIagara Falls Prairie Gates Wednesday #10
In my honest opinion, Mtnmama Wednesday #11
I.O.W.s The agreement gives Iran everything it wanted and 300 billion in reparations for Trump's war ... Botany Wednesday #13
It is not "reparations". It is a "private investment fund". AloeVera Wednesday #20
I might be wrong but @ the end of day the U.S. taxpayers will be on the hook for paying for Trump's war. Botany Wednesday #21
Of course they are. One of the many, many reasons to not rush into an unnecessary, trumped-up war of choice. AloeVera Wednesday #25
Another worthless document from the dumpie administration. KS Toronado Wednesday #14
Back channel commitments?All that matters is what is actually signed,and with Trump,half the time even that won't matter thesquanderer Wednesday #15
Everything Trump for 10+ years has gotten us to this point where NoMoreRepugs Wednesday #16
Backchannel commitments for what? The rebuilding business deals that Trump wants the bribe money to be spent on? ChicagoTeamster Wednesday #17
Maybe they're trying to figure out ways to WestMichRad Wednesday #26
Which is why they wanted to delay releasing the text until at least Friday.. SamuelAdams Wednesday #18
It was a birthday party favor for the man-child... Hugin Wednesday #19
Ah, Yessss; The Old "Back-Channel Commitments" Trick..... ColoringFool Wednesday #22
A "political document" only existing as a birthday present for the loser in the white house. travelingthrulife Wednesday #23
$300,000,000,000 is still $300,000,000,000. paulkienitz Wednesday #24
Per "back-channel agreements" it is probably 500 billion (classified for purposes of National Security) pat_k Wednesday #32
Trump and his war-mongering assholes are desperate agingdem Wednesday #27
I'm surprised they're not communicating in "pig latin". Buddyzbuddy Wednesday #28
Maybe Dotard tore up the original agreement because he didn't know about its maxsolomon Wednesday #29
TACO !! republianmushroom Wednesday #30
Of course, any back-channel agreements are WORSE. pat_k Wednesday #31
Ooh backchannel commitments Johnny2X2X Wednesday #33
They're just words. Nothing to see here. Scalded Nun Wednesday #34
Translation: the memorandum isn't worth the paper it's printed on. patphil Wednesday #35
Give me a break. City Lights Wednesday #36
LOL! Did Dean Wormer put Iran on double-secret probation? Mysterian Wednesday #37
Is a back channel agreement , one that goes straight up my ass? 3Hotdogs Wednesday #38
There is an essential rule of law. TomSlick Wednesday #39
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»US officials downplay tex...»Reply #17