Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

AloeVera

(4,585 posts)
25. Of course they are. One of the many, many reasons to not rush into an unnecessary, trumped-up war of choice.
Wed Jun 17, 2026, 10:30 AM
Yesterday

But the military cost of inflicting all that destruction is separate from war reparations to the victim of an unjustified war. Iran has suffered huge losses to its infrastructure and economy. Why were 85,000 civilian structures, 600 schools and nearly 200 medical facilities destroyed or damaged? Water towers, oil refineries, power plants - the list goes on! It all means civilian suffering and increased poverty and deprivation. In a just world the war mongers should pay but we know that's not gonna happen. They destroy and then let others - the Gulf countries in this case because of course they will be asked - try to pick up the pieces.

Yes, the war will cost taxpayers hundreds of billions all told - half a TRILLION in increased funding for the military alone if Trump's request is approved - but none of it is going for reparations to Iran, which was my point.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Pay-offs for the fat orange imbecile wolfie001 Yesterday #1
I'm pretty sure a few countries in the Middle East are very uneasy................ Lovie777 Yesterday #2
I mean, they're on the hook for $300 billion and have a full-fledged economic competitor Prairie Gates Yesterday #12
"The framework is aimed at providing Iran the ability to sell it politically to their internal audience." Really? sop Yesterday #3
More like Trump is trying to sell it to his internal audience. Baitball Blogger Yesterday #5
Projection. They're trying to spin it for people here. ananda Yesterday #9
Whipping our butts will not be hard to sell to the Iranian public. mahina 23 hrs ago #40
Back channel commitments. Baitball Blogger Yesterday #4
.... yardwork Yesterday #6
So, all that for stock options? OldBaldy1701E Yesterday #7
" aimed at providing Iran the ability to sell it politically" Strelnikov_ Yesterday #8
It's giving secret girlfriend in NIagara Falls Prairie Gates Yesterday #10
In my honest opinion, Mtnmama Yesterday #11
I.O.W.s The agreement gives Iran everything it wanted and 300 billion in reparations for Trump's war ... Botany Yesterday #13
It is not "reparations". It is a "private investment fund". AloeVera Yesterday #20
I might be wrong but @ the end of day the U.S. taxpayers will be on the hook for paying for Trump's war. Botany Yesterday #21
Of course they are. One of the many, many reasons to not rush into an unnecessary, trumped-up war of choice. AloeVera Yesterday #25
Another worthless document from the dumpie administration. KS Toronado Yesterday #14
Back channel commitments?All that matters is what is actually signed,and with Trump,half the time even that won't matter thesquanderer Yesterday #15
Everything Trump for 10+ years has gotten us to this point where NoMoreRepugs Yesterday #16
Backchannel commitments for what? The rebuilding business deals that Trump wants the bribe money to be spent on? ChicagoTeamster Yesterday #17
Maybe they're trying to figure out ways to WestMichRad Yesterday #26
Which is why they wanted to delay releasing the text until at least Friday.. SamuelAdams Yesterday #18
It was a birthday party favor for the man-child... Hugin Yesterday #19
Ah, Yessss; The Old "Back-Channel Commitments" Trick..... ColoringFool Yesterday #22
A "political document" only existing as a birthday present for the loser in the white house. travelingthrulife Yesterday #23
$300,000,000,000 is still $300,000,000,000. paulkienitz Yesterday #24
Per "back-channel agreements" it is probably 500 billion (classified for purposes of National Security) pat_k Yesterday #32
Trump and his war-mongering assholes are desperate agingdem Yesterday #27
I'm surprised they're not communicating in "pig latin". Buddyzbuddy Yesterday #28
Maybe Dotard tore up the original agreement because he didn't know about its maxsolomon Yesterday #29
TACO !! republianmushroom Yesterday #30
Of course, any back-channel agreements are WORSE. pat_k Yesterday #31
Ooh backchannel commitments Johnny2X2X Yesterday #33
They're just words. Nothing to see here. Scalded Nun Yesterday #34
Translation: the memorandum isn't worth the paper it's printed on. patphil Yesterday #35
Give me a break. City Lights Yesterday #36
LOL! Did Dean Wormer put Iran on double-secret probation? Mysterian Yesterday #37
Is a back channel agreement , one that goes straight up my ass? 3Hotdogs Yesterday #38
There is an essential rule of law. TomSlick 23 hrs ago #39
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»US officials downplay tex...»Reply #25