Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

fujiyamasan

(2,214 posts)
23. If you have a net worth of over a billion
Sun Jun 28, 2026, 05:06 AM
Sunday

And don’t want to pay this tax, what’s to keep you from leaving ASAP to establish residency elsewhere? I could also see constitutional issues if say, CA tries clawing the 5% from those that have left.

When you have a net worth that high, everything essentially becomes free. It’s not as though a short private jet or chartered flight from Austin or some other city in a red state, is anything more than a mere inconvenience. For the poor and middle class, progressive policies and a robust safety net on healthcare and abortion matter. For the ultra wealthy, not so much.

Say their companies are based in CA, does it still tax them accordingly? What’s to stop them from doing what Tesla and others have already done — by moving their headquarters elsewhere, and maybe keeping a small office in state, just to retain some talent that won’t move?

I’m not sold on Newsom for president, and I certainly agree that SV has an absurd amount of influence in Sacramento (as well as DC of course), but I’m not sure if this measure will generate the income it’s supposed to for the state.

I’m way too cynical to believe there won’t be loopholes for them to get out this…But I'm also not cynical about Newsom s motivation in opposing this. I think he brings up some real good points about how this is structured at the state level and capital outflows and economic competitiveness. If he were really cynical in vying for the nomination he’d be full bore in support of this given the direction the democratic base is heading. It’s an easier “win” for him to simply give in and back this.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

That's because he knows such a bill would never pass Fiendish Thingy Jun 26 #1
Forgive my skeptical take... GJGCA Jun 26 #2
The oligarchs will give it their best shot Fiendish Thingy Jun 26 #4
That bill is gonna pass in California hookaleft Jun 26 #6
It's not a bill Fiendish Thingy Jun 26 #7
pretty obvious he doesn't want his presidential run defined by driving business out of CA thebigidea Jun 26 #8
From what I've read, this is basically what his opposition is about. Silver Gaia Jun 27 #17
Personally I think it should be $300 million and up The Grand Illuminist Jun 27 #18
Exactly right Prairie Gates Jun 26 #11
My first thought exactly not fooled Jun 26 #14
A National Billionaire Tax is the right answer..... HOWEVER getting it passed is another story. groundloop Jun 26 #3
I'm guessing he wants billionaire's money in his pocket Buddyzbuddy Jun 26 #5
signing free college into law was better than anything Bernie ever managed thebigidea Jun 26 #9
This is also true Prairie Gates Jun 26 #12
What does Bernie have to do with this? Buddyzbuddy Jun 26 #13
Sad, but true. LudwigPastorius Jun 27 #15
Any wealth tax would have to be national. dwilso40641 Jun 26 #10
It could be state by state, but that would be a nightmare Bluetus Jun 27 #19
I'm for taxing the billionaires at both state and local levels. tirebiter Jun 27 #16
CA will allow them an installment plan of five years at one percent miyazaki Jun 27 #20
Multi-millionaires are loving all the focus on billionaires only.... Mark.b2 Jun 27 #21
Here is what I don't get. Why the hell are the opposed to paying taxes?? hookaleft Jun 27 #22
If you have a net worth of over a billion fujiyamasan Sunday #23
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Gavin Newsom opposes a Ca...»Reply #23