Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

QueerDuck

(2,331 posts)
2. We can reject right-wing traps like this without defending vandalism or property destruction.
Sun Jun 28, 2026, 05:58 PM
Jun 28

This is a classic political trap designed to put Democrats on the defensive, and we shouldn't take the bait.

The Manhattan Institute's push to classify basic disorderly conduct or vandalism as felony "civil terrorism" is an obvious, dangerous overreach designed to chill legitimate, peaceful first amendment assemblies. We should absolutely oppose creating authoritarian tools that can be weaponized against peaceful citizens holding those in power accountable.

But the way we win this argument is by being completely clear: peaceful protest is a constitutional right, but vandalism, rioting, and property destruction are crimes.

Mainstream Democrats have always stood for law and order alongside civil rights. We don't support broken windows, blocking highways, or destroying property. By firmly drawing that line, we completely neutralize their trap.

We can protect the First Amendment from right-wing overreach without ever giving them the ammunition to falsely claim we excuse lawlessness.

Recommendations

13 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This was always the plan, and why they constantly accused the Obama and Biden families with bogus smears. mahina Jun 28 #1
We can reject right-wing traps like this without defending vandalism or property destruction. QueerDuck Jun 28 #2
I'm not sure who here is defending property destruction as a form of political speech Ilikepurple Jun 28 #7
You make an excellent point about the legal debate, but the trap I'm talking about is purely electoral. QueerDuck Jun 29 #12
PREACH!!!!!!! When wil we LEARN this?? This is going to be an issue in the GA Gov race. Callie1979 Jun 29 #13
Yes, I agree that this sort of clarity has great political value. Ilikepurple Jun 29 #17
When we have mass unemployment unrest, they will want 'kill on sight' power SamuelTheThird Jun 28 #3
well we know where the owners live too dave99 Jun 28 #5
These Laws have existed for DECADES already in EVERY locality ! Vandalism - done disorderly conduct - done dave99 Jun 28 #4
HATE headlines like this. Just write "Manhattan Institute!" Grins Jun 28 #6
OR............................................ AZ8theist Jun 29 #11
I'm wondering if they would apply this to Jan. 6th tourists? n/t aggiesal Jun 28 #8
Of course not. warmfeet Jun 28 #9
NOTHING applies to them. Callie1979 Jun 29 #14
A front-line supporter of Trump's efforts to establish a fascist state J_William_Ryan Jun 28 #10
""This is aimed at trying to silence public demonstrations, public assemblies..." OldBaldy1701E Jun 29 #15
I've seen a lot of CIVIL TERRORISM caught on video Martin Eden Jun 29 #16
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Conservative think tank b...»Reply #2