Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Trump tries again to delay $5m sexual abuse payout to E Jean Carroll [View all]sop
(20,010 posts)As a final response to your "quibbling," I'll just quote what Joyce Vance wrote about what would be "immediately" triggered (or the moment it happened, not automatically) when the Supreme Court declined to hear Trump's appeal:
"When Donald Trump appealed the $5 million dollars the jury awarded to E. Jean Carroll in the first of her two defamation victories against him, he put that money, plus extra to cover interest, into escrow. The money would go to her immediately if the appeal terminated in her favor. Trump stipulated that would be the case if, once he asked the Supreme Court to hear his appeal on a writ of certiorari, they declined to do so, which would finalize the decision in Carrolls favor. Thats exactly what happened on Monday. That means its time for Donald Trump to pay up."
"So of course, he did, right? Hed made an agreement and he honored it."
"Alasand as you all undoubtedly anticipatedthat did not happen. Donald Trump, in fact, did not honor his agreement. He was not, yet again, a gracious loser. He has not paid up. He owes Carroll $5,779,783.00, the amount of the judgment plus post-judgment interest. Instead, he wants to delay making the payment. Its so on brand. But its not going to work this time."
"We know all of this because Carrolls lawyer, the incomparable Robbie Kaplan, had to explain it all to a judge."
Continued at link:
https://joycevance.substack.com/p/the-women-who-told-trump-no