Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ShazzieB

(23,163 posts)
67. Thanks for confirming what I suspected.
Mon Jul 13, 2026, 01:16 PM
20 hrs ago

I didn't know there was a longstanding policy regarding the use of the word "bomb" in an airport or on a plane, but I'm not at all surprised that there is such a policy. It makes perfect sense to me.

When I saw the picture of the shirt, my first thought was that it would be in poor taste to wear a shirt on an airplane that referenced bombs or bombing in any way. You don't have to read it as a threat to bomb the plane or know that the word "bomb" is verboten on planes and in airports to realize that there was a good chance of it makng someone uneasy. Just getting on a plane makes some people uneasy, so why take a chance on adding to what is already a tense situation for many?

I would imagine that flight attendants are well versed in the sorts of things that have the potential to cause problems, and they're probably trained to err on the side of caution. I see nothing wrong with that. A lot of people think of them as glorified waitresses and waiters, but one of their chief responsibilities is passenger safety, and a big part of that is keeping passengers calm and relaxed.

As for the written policy, I think the word "offensive" was chosen for a reason, as it can mean a whole lot of different things, thereby giving airline personnel the leeway to make a judgment to make judgment calls like this one. Merriam-Webster lists several definitions for the word, including "giving painful or unpleasant sensations" and "causing displeasure or resentment." What's offensive is always going to be a judgment call, and it makes sense to me that flight attendants are allowed to make such judgments. A policy that's too narrow and specific could hamper them in doing their jobs.

I love the First Amendment as much as anyone, but there have to be limitations in certain situations, and flying on a plane is one of those situations. (The old adage about yelling "Fire!" in a crowded theater comes to mind.) As much as people take airline travel as a matter of course in this day and age, being packed into what amounts to a sardine can and transported high about the earth for hours at a time is in many ways a very unnatural situation, and it seems reasonable to me that those who are entrusted with the welfare and safety of all involved should be enabled to make decisions like this one, whether everyone else agrees with them or not.

Recommendations

4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Did his darker skin (visible in picture) RockCreek 22 hrs ago #1
Hmmmm - let's guess. 3catwoman3 22 hrs ago #3
Or three guesses, first two don't count....🤔 littlemissmartypants 22 hrs ago #6
Hmmm.... OldBaldy1701E 36 min ago #92
I'm not offended. badhair77 22 hrs ago #2
"How dare you prick my conscience... AloeVera 22 hrs ago #4
Who supported bombing kids? yardwork 22 hrs ago #12
The person "offended". AloeVera 21 hrs ago #18
???? yardwork 21 hrs ago #19
You are somehow conflating two very distinct policies. AloeVera 21 hrs ago #30
There must be a more detailed article that is being referenced here. yardwork 21 hrs ago #31
Since you believe a policy against offensive attire and one on endangering public safety are one and the same... AloeVera 21 hrs ago #45
I appreciate your research into this. yardwork 21 hrs ago #46
I appreciate your research into this. yardwork 21 hrs ago #47
Lack of research is not the problem here. AloeVera 21 hrs ago #51
It's not a question of enforcing a long-standing policy SpankMe 21 hrs ago #39
We all know what the shirt refers to TBF 19 hrs ago #68
Airlines treat flying as a privilege, not a right. yardwork 19 hrs ago #69
lol - yes all of that is factual TBF 18 hrs ago #70
I'm certainly not defending it. yardwork 18 hrs ago #71
Wearing a shirt is not defacing property - TBF 17 hrs ago #73
We all must kowtow to our corporate masters Farmer-Rick 31 min ago #93
If you want to fly on a commercial airline, yes. yardwork 1 min ago #94
What the heck United? One of your flight attendants found that offensive? Biophilic 22 hrs ago #5
Welcome to the United States of Authoritarianism. littlemissmartypants 22 hrs ago #8
Here's what I would have told the personnel he spoke with BaronChocula 20 hrs ago #64
Any reference to bombing or bombs gets anyone kicked off planes, yardwork 22 hrs ago #7
My thought exactly. And good morning. NT mahatmakanejeeves 22 hrs ago #9
Good morning! yardwork 22 hrs ago #10
Maybe she should have explained that policy whathehell 21 hrs ago #16
Sounds like she did. yardwork 21 hrs ago #17
As the passenger said, whathehell 21 hrs ago #41
According to the article, that's exactly what happened. yardwork 21 hrs ago #42
"joked about a bomb" ... VERY DAMNED DIFFERENT. Again CONTEXT matters. hlthe2b 21 hrs ago #50
I read your report of the article whathehell 21 hrs ago #52
You might be responding to the wrong post? yardwork 21 hrs ago #54
You are correct whathehell 20 hrs ago #58
No worries at all. yardwork 20 hrs ago #61
Good.. whathehell 20 hrs ago #66
You are correct whathehell 20 hrs ago #59
Again context matters for use of the word "bomb" hlthe2b 21 hrs ago #49
Exactly.. whathehell 20 hrs ago #56
Nice stretch there. AloeVera 21 hrs ago #20
Context matters, yardwork. That is an incredible stretch. I like his lawyer's odds on this one. hlthe2b 21 hrs ago #24
Really. yardwork 21 hrs ago #27
Uggh huh. Threatening to remove him if he did not remove his shirt is a viable "harm" especially hlthe2b 21 hrs ago #36
yeah- R0ckyRac00n 20 hrs ago #55
Thanks for confirming what I suspected. ShazzieB 20 hrs ago #67
The First Amendment is not relevant Cirsium 13 hrs ago #83
THANK YOU Skittles 15 hrs ago #81
It will be settled out of court. The Wizard 22 hrs ago #11
Did he miss the flight? yardwork 22 hrs ago #15
So their policy is if anyone of their staff is offended by your shirt, intheflow 21 hrs ago #34
You don't say the word "BOMB" in an airport or on a jet... nor should you make references to them. QueerDuck 22 hrs ago #13
His subsequent actions tend to support that conclusion. yardwork 22 hrs ago #14
Really...? displacedvermoter 21 hrs ago #23
You. Don't. Say. BOMB. In. An. Airport. 💣️✈️ QueerDuck 21 hrs ago #26
Ok displacedvermoter 21 hrs ago #29
He didn't say it. AloeVera 21 hrs ago #38
Blaming the flight attendant personally ignores the reality of the airline industry and how corporate liability works. QueerDuck 17 hrs ago #72
The airline itself characterized it as a dress code violation, not a safety violation. AloeVera 17 hrs ago #74
Passengers must obey flight crew instructions. He did. Then whined about it. End of story. QueerDuck 17 hrs ago #75
So, using your own words, someone made a "subjective judgement" AloeVera 15 hrs ago #78
As a legitimate backup to the threatening word of bomb. Yes. When it comes to flight crew the rule is simple.... QueerDuck 15 hrs ago #79
I want that shirt to wear to protests, Bayard 21 hrs ago #21
This is the ridiculous side of those who want to make everything antisemitic and there are those hlthe2b 21 hrs ago #22
Who said this incident is antisemitic? yardwork 21 hrs ago #28
I listed this as but one of several possibilities. Again, jumping to conclusions is problematic hlthe2b 21 hrs ago #32
What similar incidents? yardwork 21 hrs ago #35
If she found that offensive then she must find 'Bombing kids is self defense' acceptable ToxMarz 21 hrs ago #25
Exactly! If his flight partner had a t-shirt with your slogan, which one would get kicked off? TheRickles 16 hrs ago #77
A thought experiment relogic 21 hrs ago #33
I find that to be extraordinarily unlikely. yardwork 21 hrs ago #37
Please be specific relogic 21 hrs ago #40
Your last sentence. yardwork 21 hrs ago #43
So, then relogic 21 hrs ago #53
Sure, the Trump administration is nuts and authoritarian. yardwork 20 hrs ago #60
You underestimate relogic 13 hrs ago #85
or maybe Skittles 13 hrs ago #84
Hell, I want one! no_hypocrisy 21 hrs ago #44
Just don't try to wear it on a plane! yardwork 21 hrs ago #48
In related news Soul_of_Wit 20 hrs ago #57
He'll win Joinfortmill 20 hrs ago #62
He didn't mention any names. Why would one be upset?. twodogsbarking 20 hrs ago #63
Me feelwings were hurt. I've seen shirts on planes WAY more "Hot Words" chouchou 20 hrs ago #65
Irony... Both sides of the conflict could use the same meme/slogan on their propaganda. OC375 16 hrs ago #76
Would an idiot donning mAga attire get treated the same? BHDem53 15 hrs ago #80
Not likely... displacedvermoter 14 hrs ago #82
In solidarity.... Dethhogan 12 hrs ago #86
Selective reading by a not too bright airline person. Aussie105 11 hrs ago #87
I'm offended by that United flight attendant RainCaster 10 hrs ago #88
Will United make the MAGAt change their shirt? Or take off their red hat? maspaha 10 hrs ago #89
Gonna go out on a limb here and say air travel is not the place to fly your position flags high LearnedHand 9 hrs ago #90
I'm giving the flight attendant a mulligan on this Ruby the Liberal 1 hr ago #91
Latest Discussions»Region Forums»New Jersey»N.J. man says he was almo...»Reply #67