Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Website, DB, & Software Developers

Recursion

(56,582 posts)

2. I think that's the only native WSDL provider in the stack

Reply to DaveJ (Original post)

Fri May 17, 2013, 05:40 AM

May 2013

So if you need WSDL for any service definition, you have to pull in all of WCF. Of course a small custom site probably doesn't need WSDL, but people love scalability nowadays, even for stuff that will never have to scale.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Is there any practical way/reason to use WCF on a small website? [View all] DaveJ May 2013 OP

Host WCF in a service ChromeFoundry May 2013 #1

I'm using a web host DaveJ May 2013 #5

I think that's the only native WSDL provider in the stack Recursion May 2013 #2

Thanks for the additional perspective DaveJ May 2013 #3

I'm a Linux/BSD guy for the most part; I just remember that from my last .NET experience Recursion May 2013 #4

I just like to learn by doing DaveJ May 2013 #6