Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Men's Group
In reply to the discussion: Study challenges assumptions on wartime sexual violence [View all]4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)9. Apparently this ruffled some feathers
http://www.democraticunderground.com/125511831
Aha! The initial study must be wrong. Let's see what errors in the report they point out.
Yeah, shit is about to get real! Tear that misogynistic study a new one!
Ha take that . . . . er wait.
Huh.
So it's true. But it's still wrong because they don't like the conclusions.
Well there you go. Anything that doesn't support the mantra is a lie, even if it's true.
Just like pointing out that men also get raped or suffer DV is a lie because that means that women aren't the only victims. Even if you can cite thousands of studies to back up those claims.
/some people have a lot tied up in being not just being the victims, but being the *only* recognized victims.
//it's excusable when children believe closing their eyes and covering their ears can make things they don't like disappear. Less so when adults do it.
New YorkNo, wartime rape is not decreasing, and no, it is not suddenly a figment of our imagination.
Aha! The initial study must be wrong. Let's see what errors in the report they point out.
WMCs Women Under Siege project is clearing up common misconceptions about rape in war and getting to the heart of what this report isand isntsaying. In Rape in war: Are we getting it wrong? Director Lauren Wolfe argues that the media must tread very carefully when covering these findings.
Yeah, shit is about to get real! Tear that misogynistic study a new one!
By refuting claims that rape in war is increasing and stating that the media is focusing too much on extreme cases, the authors run the risk of appearing to downplay the problem, Wolfe says. With up to 500,000 women raped in Rwandas conflict alone, were not in a position to undercut what happens to women in war. This is a call to arms for us to recognize that we must look closely at what is happening to women on the ground so we can better understand it.
Ha take that . . . . er wait.
I worry that victims in future conflicts will not attract the resources they need if there is an expectation that nearly every woman in a country must be raped before policymakers will focus their attention there, Cohen says.
Huh.
So it's true. But it's still wrong because they don't like the conclusions.
Well there you go. Anything that doesn't support the mantra is a lie, even if it's true.
Just like pointing out that men also get raped or suffer DV is a lie because that means that women aren't the only victims. Even if you can cite thousands of studies to back up those claims.
/some people have a lot tied up in being not just being the victims, but being the *only* recognized victims.
//it's excusable when children believe closing their eyes and covering their ears can make things they don't like disappear. Less so when adults do it.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
30 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Here's a fact that NEVER fails to piss tons of people off: The World is getting more peaceful.
Warren DeMontague
Oct 2012
#4
Bringing up actual factual information and statistics is, apparently, considered "derailing" in some
Warren DeMontague
Oct 2012
#11
University press release misconstrues HSRP press release and study findings
One_Life_To_Give
Oct 2012
#21