Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Major Nikon

(36,922 posts)
10. I don't follow you
Tue Jun 4, 2013, 01:34 PM
Jun 2013

First you say it isn't ad hominem at all, then you say other factors negate the ad hominem which appears ambiguous. My understanding of ad hominem is that it's an attack against the person rather than the argument. Calling someone a pervert due to their pattern of published subjects seems to fit the bill. Your first statement, "Written by a male journalist. Doesn't get any better" also appears to be a sexist personal attack.

You may be right and I may just not want to get it, but I didn't see much in your argument that didn't appear to take the form of a personal attack. What am I missing?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Men's Group»The Truth About Female De...»Reply #10