Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Personal Finance and Investing

customerserviceguy

(25,219 posts)

2. I don't see anything wrong with this

Reply to question everything (Original post)

Fri Nov 8, 2019, 08:36 PM

Nov 2019

Life expectancy has changed in the last nearly twenty years, the tax code should reflect that when life expectancy is pertinent to taxation.

It all gets taxed eventually when the spouse of the person with the tax-deferred account passes away.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

2 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Retirees' Mandatory IRA Withdrawals Would Shrink Under Treasury Plan [View all] question everything Nov 2019 OP

I think changing the age to at least 72 is a good idea. The 70.5 spooky3 Nov 2019 #1

I don't see anything wrong with this customerserviceguy Nov 2019 #2