Creative Speculation
In reply to the discussion: Richard Gage of AE911Truth on C-Span's Washington Journal Friday Aug 1st, 9:15am EDT [View all]superbeachnut
(381 posts)Gage says thermite was used. No steel shows damage from thermite. OOPS
Gage says high explosives were used in the towers - no damage to steel from explosives. OOPS
Gage says he has overwhelming evidence, yet he can't produce any. OOPS
Gage lies and people who can't think for themselves fall for it.
No sounds on 911 from explosives. OOPS
13th year of failure for 911 truth, and Gage has failed to list his evidence, but followers think there is evidence. His followers can't list the evidence, they are faith based believers in CD woo, and the undefined inside job. Cool part during the CSPAM crap today... Gage has adopted pilots for truth failed creed, of "we offer no theory", we need a new investigation; Gage is a fraud, 911 truth only offer lies and what sounds good to paranoid conspiracy theorists who think 13 years of failure is a good start.
The CSPAN guy debunked Gage using NIST, it was funny, 911 truth believers don't understand reality.
Why did people survive in a stairwell of the WTC towers with all the high explosives going off? Are all 911 truth faith based followers ignorant of blast effects? Do any 911 truth faith based followers realize the energy that did the destruction of the WTC complex was equal to over 260 2,000 pounds bombs, and this can be calculated before collapse by using E=mgh? Why are 911 truth followers unable to do physics?
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):