Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Creative Speculation
In reply to the discussion: North Tower Exploding... [View all]AZCat
(8,346 posts)21. I'm quite familiar with it.
Your application of that particular law, however, is not appropriate. Neither is your strawman in the second paragraph.
I do recommend, though, if you are trying to convince people of something you should probably stick to terms and concepts with which you are familiar. Your description of the collapse of the towers indicates you are not as familiar with basic physics as you might think. Terms like "speed" and "acceleration" have specific meanings, and you've managed to jumble them up into an incoherent mess. This is not uncommon for laypeople, but is an excellent example why some discussions aren't meant to include everyone. Perhaps you should just leave this to the experienced professionals?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
93 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Watch the video. A large section of the building collapsed from the fire alone. n/t
cpwm17
Aug 2014
#53
Of course it free fell, with the help of all the floors above where the planes hit.
IronGate
Aug 2014
#7
"I'm not the one, however, making mistakes about fundamental physics concepts." Yes you are!
wildbilln864
Aug 2014
#65