Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hack89

(39,181 posts)
10. So I just read one of his articles and I see his confusion.
Mon Aug 18, 2014, 09:12 PM
Aug 2014

He makes no provision for the structural damage done to the WTC by the impact of the 767. He ignores potential damage to the fireproofing and he ignores the added weight that each assembly had to support. He also seems to think steel has to be heated to enormous temperatures before it loses significant strength. All in all what one would expect from a water testing chemist.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Creative Speculation»Kevin Ryan : On Why NIST'...»Reply #10