9-11 Molten Steel Forensic Evidence & Eyewitness Accounts

[wildbilln864]

1. good points from another poster:

"Some major problems with the melted aluminum theory: 1) What caused a 1220 degree fire to begin with? Just because heat has nowhere to escape doesn't mean an 800 degree fire from jet fuel can magically heat up to 1220 degrees to melt the plane. He says "huge amount of molten aluminum" contacts water and causes an explosion - but no jet fuel can melt an aluminum airplane. This theory misses some major points. 2) WTC7's collapse was not slower than the towers. Actually, once it started falling, it fell 105 feet in 2.25 seconds, which the NIST admits is "freefall acceleration". 1/2 the building fell in a freefall collapse, which means there was 0% resistance from the vertical steel columns. So far, zero journal or reports can explain the freefal collapse of building 7. IT's funny, the MIT professor Eager doesn't even buy the whole explosion theory at all. he says it's totally wrong. I am interested in what caused the extreme heat that melted the steel in the towers. The official reports of the govt have tried to cover up the facts, but some professors have attempted to explain it. None have succeeded. Will they ever?"