Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Feminists

TwilightZone

(28,835 posts)

1. It's always a bit dangerous to analyze arguments as a sign of how the judges might rule.

Reply to Soph0571 (Original post)

Wed Mar 4, 2020, 06:24 PM

Mar 2020

That being said, it does sound fairly promising.

On a side note, I can't believe that we're counting on Roberts to be the "rational" vote in a lot of these cases, but here we are. We're probably lucky that he seems very concerned about the legacy of "his" court and may be hesitant to do anything too rash, though one never knows.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

1 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Abortion rights had a surprisingly hopeful day in the Supreme Court [View all] Soph0571 Mar 2020 OP

It's always a bit dangerous to analyze arguments as a sign of how the judges might rule. TwilightZone Mar 2020 #1