Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jamastiene

(38,204 posts)
14. I have to say something controversial, on this subject.
Thu Oct 11, 2012, 04:01 PM
Oct 2012

I feel rather strongly about it or I would not say it. When it comes to Aileen Wournos, I believe that if what she said was true of her first murder (that she was raped), she wasn't really guilty of murder, per se, on that one. I can't say much about the rest of her murders, but if she was raped on that first one, it should have been considered self defense. It was never brought up at her trial, but the first guy she killed already had a criminal record for rape. So, it is quite possible she was telling the truth about that. I always kind of felt for her on that first one.

Otherwise, I have always been fascinated by what causes serial killers to do what they do. How is it that some people have all of the classic "warning signs," yet, they are not serial killers? I guess that goes back to the nature vs. nurture debate. I have always wondered how many female serial killers there are too.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Feminists»Female Serial Killers by ...»Reply #14