DU Community Help

highplainsdem

(62,290 posts)

18. UTUSN, you're apparently complaining about multiple people objecting to the lurid, non-historical content

Mon Mar 30, 2026, 02:03 PM

Mar 30

of an AI-generated "history" channel you were urging people in GD to watch videos from a week ago.

Yes, the fact it was AI-generated was brought up, but there was more emphasis on the content being about "history" that didn't happen, the illustrations of women being sexualized, and the apparent focus of that AI channel, judging by the page of thumbnails with the video titles, being rape, torture and perversion.

You completely ignored my question about the content, and you ignored or brushed aside the other comments on the content and the lack of historical accuracy.

This was my last response to you there:

https://www.democraticunderground.com/100221118242#post16

Your exposition in the OP didn't begin to explain your recommending a 'history" channel where

two of the videos are illustrated - the thumbnail image created to sell the video - by images of soldiers restraining women who are apparently about to be raped by animals (a horse and a bull),

one shows a woman screaming as she's raped by Genghis Khan,

two show captive women hanging in the air, screaming, their legs spread,

one shows two women in ripped clothing pushed against a wall, armed soldiers behind them, the video about "the filthy fate of female prisoners in Rome,"

one shows an older woman screaming as she's boiled alive,

and so on.

One sickening scene after another illustrating the "history" videos you're recommending.

Your OP recommends a video about Herod that "goes into breathtaking detail about his personal atrocities" - why do you want people to view images and videos about atrocities like rape, torture and perversions?

The illos with those videos are some of the most grotesque I've seen on YouTube, even on AI slop channels.

I was asking about that because I'd never seen anything like that recommended on DU before. And you simply referred to AI in your replies to me.

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

6 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

SheltieLover kcoates CrispyQ WhiskeyGrinder questionseverything Prairie_Seagull

53 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Need advice on coping with single-issue flamers spammers. [View all] UTUSN Mar 30 OP

Like the old saying goes... LuckyCharms Mar 30 #1

Yip, the no response has its message. The flamers go by the internet "rule" about the Last Word wins. UTUSN Mar 30 #11

LC, please see reply 18. highplainsdem Mar 30 #23

I was unfamiliar with the thread, highplainsdem, and was replying in generalities. LuckyCharms Mar 30 #46

If you use "ignore," you will not regret it, IMO! Why let a few people annoy you and get in your head? Doodley Mar 30 #2

Same experience here jmbar2 Mar 30 #3

Absolutely perfect, am saving it. Would like to post it to the flamers but it might be called a personal attack. UTUSN Mar 30 #7

It is a striking resemblance jmbar2 Mar 30 #10

Am going to post it in Lounge, crediting you, in order to get it into my Journal. Thanks! UTUSN Mar 30 #12

You may need to include a Trigger Warning for jmbar2 Mar 30 #13

That's what I thought too. FoxNewsSucks Mar 30 #34

My first impression of the WARREN resemblance was just the immediate impact of the face. UTUSN Mar 30 #36

There's definitely a facial resemblance FoxNewsSucks Mar 30 #38

Yeah, the vid is spoiled for me now, too. This highlights another flamer trait, UTUSN Mar 30 #44

The ignore button is your friend Fiendish Thingy Mar 30 #4

We provide tools to help with problems like this, but it's up to you to use them EarlG Mar 30 #5

Yip, my choices make it insoluble for me. UTUSN Mar 30 #9

Please see reply 18 to understand the thread UTUSN is complaining about others complaining about. highplainsdem Mar 30 #20

short of an alert (given they have actually demeaned or broken other rules) about your only alternative stopdiggin Mar 30 #6

Yip, doing that more than can like, reaping a pain in the gut and actual stress. Sometimes I dread UTUSN Mar 30 #8

As a big fan of the ignore function, I'll tell ypu how I manage it. NNadir Mar 30 #14

Excellent and very understanding points. Back when, during the early Ignore era, tried it on bad actors. UTUSN Mar 30 #15

That's the best part of an ignore list. Checking through it and realizing... NNadir Mar 30 #19

Yip, silently ignoring the stalking and lies until they expose themselves is satisfying when it happens. UTUSN Mar 30 #21

See reply 18 to understand the thread UTUSN is complaining about others commenting on. He was highplainsdem Mar 30 #22

Ok. I'm not going to get involved other than to say.. NNadir Mar 30 #25

I'm not going to ignore someone recommending an AI channel using illustrations of rape to advertise highplainsdem Mar 30 #30

Ok. I understand your postion, but to be perfectly clear I often... NNadir Mar 30 #35

Timely and relevant post. yorkster Mar 30 #16

Thanks for the understanding! - Insoluble because of my choices, but at least it's on record. UTUSN Mar 30 #17

UTUSN, you're apparently complaining about multiple people objecting to the lurid, non-historical content highplainsdem Mar 30 #18

And btw, if anyone here who's been sympathizing with UTUSN feels the replies he received in that highplainsdem Mar 30 #24

I use the Ignore feature because, for me, it's better not to know what's out there. mahatmakanejeeves Mar 30 #26

Yip, I use a kind of Ignore - skipping. It's always been irritating when posters feel obligated UTUSN Mar 30 #28

Please see reply 18 and let me know if you think I was wrong for objecting to the content of the highplainsdem Mar 30 #31

I ignore people like that to keep track of them. pwb Mar 30 #27

Thanks. It's consolation that karma sometimes makes itself known. UTUSN Mar 30 #29

Please see reply 18. UTUSN is unhappy that people objected to his reccing an AI channel with gross illos of rape, highplainsdem Mar 30 #33

I know how you feel about AI from Music Appreciation. pwb Mar 30 #37

"but there is a moderate side where the main content is not pernicious," WhiskeyGrinder Mar 30 #32

The thread UTUSN is upset about wasn't primarily a debate about AI, either. It was about the inaccurate highplainsdem Mar 30 #39

I also pushed back on the inaccuracies ("100 vikings vs 10,000 Mongols," come on) and I think it's important to WhiskeyGrinder Mar 30 #40

If what was posted was inaccurate then post an article or video with the correct info questionseverything Mar 30 #41

He was recommending an entire channel whose video thumbnails focused on rape, torture and highplainsdem Mar 30 #42

Your post I referenced said it was about the inaccuracy of the video questionseverything Mar 30 #43

I just scrolled past thumbnails of hundreds of YouTube videos about Khan. None of them showed Khan raping highplainsdem Mar 30 #45

Honestly you keep moving the goal posts questionseverything Mar 30 #50

I'm not moving the goalposts at all. This is the same objection I made when UTUSN posted about highplainsdem Mar 30 #52

Don't respond to them LearnedHand Mar 30 #47

Thanks much. UTUSN Mar 30 #48

IGNORE IS YOUR FRIEND MY FRIEND Skittles Mar 30 #49

Block them using the ignore feature. n/t FSogol Mar 30 #51

This message was self-deleted by its author EarlG Mar 30 #53