Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Populist Reform of the Democratic Party

Showing Original Post only (View all)

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
Fri Nov 14, 2014, 02:43 PM Nov 2014

"...What the Democratic Party Needs is a Rump Formation of Dissenters..."--William Greider [View all]

[b[How the Democratic Party Lost Its Soul

The voters themselves resemble the supernumeraries in a grand opera: they appear on stage at election time, always lavishly praised by the pols. But they are given no lines to speak or songs to sing.


William Greider
http://www.thenation.com/article/190385/how-democratic-party-lost-its-soul

Long ago, the party abandoned its working-class base (of all colors) and steadily distanced itself from the unglamorous conditions that matter most in people’s lives. Traditional party bulwarks like organized labor and racial minorities became second-string players in the hierarchy that influences party policy. But the Dems didn’t just lose touch with the people they claimed to speak for; they betrayed core constituencies and adopted pro-business, pro-finance policies that actively injure working people.

The shift away from the people was embraced most dramatically when Bill Clinton’s New Democrats came to power in the 1990s. Clinton double-crossed labor with NAFTA and subsequent trade agreements, which encouraged the great migration of manufacturing jobs to low-wage economies. Clinton’s bank deregulation shifted the economic rewards to finance and set the stage for the calamity that struck in 2008. Wall Street won; working people lost. Clinton presided over the financialization of the Democratic Party. Obama merely inherited his playbook and has governed accordingly, often with the same policy-makers.

“The people,” of course, are still present in the party, but they’re treated mainly as data for election strategies. The voters themselves resemble the supernumeraries in a grand opera: they appear on stage at election time, always lavishly praised by the pols. But they are given no lines to speak or songs to sing.

Instead of actually talking to people, as the old party precinct captains used to do, the campaigns now rely on TV ads to shape public opinion, and polling and focus groups to monitor the views of citizens. The communication is reversed: instead of asking people what they need as a guide to governing, people are asked what the party needs to say (or not say) to harvest votes.


---snip---

What we need is a rump formation of dissenters who will break free of the Democratic Party’s confines and set a new agenda that will build the good society rather than feed bloated wealth, disloyal corporations and absurd foreign wars. This is the politics the country needs: purposeful insurrection inside and outside party bounds, and a willingness to disrupt the regular order. And we need it now, to inject reality into the postelection spin war within the party. On one side, the right-wingers will blame the loss on Obama’s unpopularity, claiming his economic policy is too liberal; progressives must counter that the Democrats lost because they had no economic message aside from Obama’s replay of tired Wall Street bromides that misfired so spectacularly.

This is the fight that really matters, and it was coming no matter how bad the Democratic losses were.

http://www.thenation.com/article/190385/how-democratic-party-lost-its-soul
30 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Kick NYC_SKP Nov 2014 #1
Can you imagine a 2016 election wherein Liz Warren faced off truedelphi Nov 2014 #2
This happened in the early 70s... Eleanors38 Nov 2014 #3
That is an excellent article! It says everything that many of us have been saying for quite some sabrina 1 Nov 2014 #4
Clinton didn't scrap the Fairness Doctrine meow2u3 Nov 2014 #19
k and r. all of this. bbgrunt Nov 2014 #5
K & R democrank Nov 2014 #6
Happy to serve 99th_Monkey Nov 2014 #7
Where do I sign up? FairWinds Nov 2014 #8
Agree, and i am ready and able to serve to advance the progressive liberal Democratic ideas. peacebird Nov 2014 #16
I agree it is Inevitable and Mr. Mustard Nov 2014 #9
K&R DeSwiss Nov 2014 #10
Very clear when you take Blue Dogs into account SleeplessinSoCal Nov 2014 #11
K&R ReRe Nov 2014 #12
There's nothing preventing any of you from becoming actual activists... ConservativeDemocrat Nov 2014 #13
Ahhh..but WE ARE "Actual Activists" and many have been here since KoKo Nov 2014 #14
Good for you, KoKo ConservativeDemocrat Nov 2014 #25
Oh, snap! djean111 Nov 2014 #15
I've been here since day one of the D.U. ConservativeDemocrat Nov 2014 #26
WE ARE actual activists. Odin2005 Nov 2014 #21
You're right of course. None of here do a single thing politically except preach to our DU choir. Scuba Nov 2014 #22
We don't need yet another rump organization. Jim Lane Nov 2014 #17
Agree...but the "POWER" will be when we UNITE...and that's FEARFUL KoKo Nov 2014 #18
Yet another "rump" org Cosmic Kitten Nov 2014 #29
in gd and p14, dissent is met with a swarm of threats and epithets Doctor_J Nov 2014 #20
K&R Scuba Nov 2014 #23
That kind of Rump won't do a thing like-mind Nov 2014 #24
"Rump of Dissenters" to me means Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren KoKo Nov 2014 #30
K&R'd. snot Nov 2014 #27
k/r 840high Nov 2014 #28
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Populist Reform of the Democratic Party»"...What the Democra...»Reply #0