Hillary Clinton IS A Liberal? So What? [View all]
I don't doubt her credentials on that front.
I'm just saying that at this place and in this time, being liberal is no longer enough.
We are in an economic fight for our lives, and we need an economic populist to lead that fight. Despite Clinton's impressive resume, despite her liberal street creds, she has never really been a populist.
Despite her progressive words, she has never really stood with the 99%.
Despite her campaign rhetoric, she has never really been willing to fight for the middle class, not when doing so might jeopordize her relationship with the same Wall Street interests that underwrite her campaigns.
She's a great Lefty Liberal, in an America that can no longer choose candidates based on their Left-Right differences. Times have changed. The rules of engagement have been rewritten.
To paraphrase another Clinton campaign: "It's the Economic Justice, Stupid!"
There's only one candidate in this race that can draw a real comparison to the New Deal policies of FDR.
There's only one candidate in this race that could stand on Roosevelt Island and give a speech about economic justice, without bringing up the spectres of Glass-Steagall's repeal and Goldman Sach's donations.
There's only one candidate in this race that can really lead a battle against Wall Street.
Ask yourself honestly if you think that candidate is Hillary Clinton, or if that candidate is Bernie Sanders.
In honor of our choice, I'm changing my populist icon from Warren to Sanders, and am sending Bernie another $50.
No hate for Hillary, I just want someone whose desire to defend the 99% outweighs their fear of offending the 1%.