Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

demwing

(16,916 posts)
12. A liberal might, a progressive populist wouldn't
Tue Jun 16, 2015, 01:42 PM
Jun 2015

If you use the standard dictionary definition of Liberal: "Open to new behavior or opinions and willing to discard traditional values"

I'm not always liberal, because I believe that some traditional values should not be discarded. 3rd way Dems are liberals because of their willingness to discard traditional Democratic party values, like Social Security, Medicare, support of Labor, and protection of the middle class.

But we're bypassing the point - I don't care if she's the most liberal politician in Washington, or the least.

"Liberal" is not enough. Not anymore. Left-Right is not enough of a distinction. Not anymore.

The struggle of our time is between the 1% and the 99%. Oligarchs v Populists. The power elite v the people.

Within that matrix, it's much more clear to me why Clinton is the unacceptable Democratic candidate - on every metric, she's on the wrong side of history.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Populist Reform of the Democratic Party»Hillary Clinton IS A Libe...»Reply #12