Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

merrily

(45,251 posts)
5. OK. It was not the secretary of state's decision, but state law, because Wellstone had died.
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 05:50 PM
Jul 2015
Democrats have until Thursday, four days before the election, to name a new candidate. Once they do, election officials would prepare 3 million new supplemental ballots and blot out the names of the Senate candidates on the original one. Absentee votes would count for Coleman but not for Wellstone, according to state law.

Voters who cast absentee ballots for Wellstone would be permitted to go to the polls on Nov. 5 and vote for the new Democratic nominee.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/2002/10/27/mondale-likely-to-yield-to-pleas-to-run-for-senate/61f532e4-2b54-415c-9385-f15e05cd5243/

Makes sense: There is no guaranty that someone who filled out an absentee ballot for Wellstone while he was alive would vote for Wellstone if he were dead. Nor is there any guaranty that a voter who voted for Wellstone while he was alive intended his or her vote to go to Mondale.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Populist Reform of the Democratic Party»"What about Mondale?...»Reply #5