Populist Reform of the Democratic Party
In reply to the discussion: Daily Kos: Job titles do not necessarily equate to accomplishments or qualifications [View all]Warpy
(113,703 posts)Ted Rall is usually a little more insightful than that.
I do agree that she seemed like a place holder as Secretary of State and produced no new groundbreaking alliances or treaties. She didn't screw things up, either, something you can't say about the Republicans in the office before her.
I don't agree that her personal life makes her a bad role model. Bad role models screw up their own lives. I especially don't think she's dumb.
What I do find disturbing is her inability/unwillingness to deal with the shortcomings of her DLC campaign organization, the very thing that cost her the nomination in 2008. Instead of anticipating Sanders and Warren, she's been out in right field and reacting to them late and very reluctantly. Populism isn't her style, I do get that, but times are changing and she doesn't seem to be capable of changing with them.
Clinton would be a dream candidate in good economic times, promising stability and business as usual. I'm afraid that message is falling flat to the 90% who have been in recession for 7 years and only appeals to the 10% who have benefited from the hyperinflated stock market. No one is going to get elected with 10% of the vote.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):