Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Wiz Imp

(8,396 posts)
10. There s definitely photographic evidence in the files
Tue Nov 18, 2025, 10:18 PM
Nov 18

Bondi already admitted it months ago. However, most damning photographic can be withheld or redacted.

c) Permitted withholdings.—

(1) The Attorney general may withhold or redact the segregable portions of records that—

(A) contain personally identifiable information of victims or victims’ personal and medical files and similar files the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy;

(B) depict or contain child sexual abuse materials (CSAM) as defined under 18 U.S.C. 2256 and prohibited under 18 U.S.C. 2252–2252A;

(D) depict or contain images of death, physical abuse, or injury of any person

Recommendations

5 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

yeah but it's to protect the victims.....him nt msongs Nov 18 #1
I would be shocked if there was photographic evidence. gordianot Nov 18 #2
There s definitely photographic evidence in the files Wiz Imp Nov 18 #10
Yeah, right NJCher Nov 19 #28
He's in a no win position malaise Nov 18 #3
Two things malaise Nov 18 #4
Yes. Did you see Comer has subpoenaed two banks. yellow dahlia Nov 18 #7
Yep malaise Nov 18 #8
I love Lawrence also. yellow dahlia Nov 18 #9
Those 2 banks paid out millions of dollars to Epstein victims. Wiz Imp Nov 18 #12
Sometimes not knowing but speculating is more dangerous. Ocelot II Nov 18 #5
Weren't some of the emails from the estate redacted? MichMan Nov 18 #6
I would assume the House Oversight committee who received the files Wiz Imp Nov 18 #17
It was reported that Epstein's estate did the redacting. n/t Emrys Nov 19 #22
I doubt anything that could get Trump is in whatever comes out Jarqui Nov 18 #11
Easy code to break. xuplate Nov 18 #13
Yep. Releasing "scrubbed" files will not make it go away. Wiz Imp Nov 18 #14
Pages are numbered QED Nov 18 #15
I don't think they'll be redacted Javaman Nov 18 #16
Black boxes are obsolete Diraven Nov 18 #21
hope so...nt Javaman Nov 19 #24
Paging Peter Thiel, Palantir, and "digital janitor" to clean up anything the FBI agents missed. Botany Nov 19 #27
If they come out without any Trump references Johonny Nov 18 #18
I think that is what he is shooting for. drray23 Nov 18 #19
Every redaction will be trump or a good buddy of his. sheshe2 Nov 18 #20
I've been cynical about it planj07 Nov 19 #23
"explitive deleted" H2O Man Nov 19 #25
As my Polish grandmother used to say....lie all you want... MiHale Nov 19 #26
Well Timewas Nov 19 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If the Epstein files come...»Reply #10