Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Claims to close & close are 2 different things. nt EX500rider Saturday #1
Iran's revolutionary guards tell ships passage through Strait of Hormuz 'not allowed', EU naval mission official says orangecrush Saturday #2
yes that is claiming it's closed, does not mean it is EX500rider Saturday #4
However, it means that no tanker captain in his right mind Another Jackalope Saturday #12
"Tankers Divert From Strait of Hormuz" orangecrush Saturday #3
Sure, it's a hot war zone but does not mean the straights are closed just because Iran says so EX500rider Saturday #6
Would I be correct orangecrush Saturday #7
Tankers diverting to be cautious isn't the same as no shipping passing through we shall see EX500rider Saturday #25
Thank you orangecrush Saturday #27
Diverting where? sarisataka Saturday #30
Diverting to somewhere that's not an active war zone EX500rider Saturday #37
Which means sarisataka Saturday #39
No. Commercial ships do not just say "damn the torpedoes" and sail to see what happens muriel_volestrangler Saturday #10
Seems simple enough. Disaffected Saturday #8
There is no part in narrow enough where one tanker could block it EX500rider Saturday #26
Then sink the next one. Disaffected Saturday #31
The narrowest part of the straight is 21 miles EX500rider Saturday #33
The point is, Disaffected Saturday #35
They can but then they risk all the neighboring countries in the Gulf joining the war EX500rider Saturday #42
They are already bombing neighbouring countries Disaffected Saturday #43
Yeah, but the DOW WAS over 50,000. multigraincracker Saturday #5
Fifty thousand *dollars*! Ocelot II Saturday #9
How DARE you!!!!! Swede Saturday #15
UKMTO advisory: muriel_volestrangler Saturday #11
The Straight Greg_In_SF Saturday #13
Here's a decent one madville Saturday #16
Shipping traffic will still go through madville Saturday #14
Yep Greg_In_SF Saturday #17
Gas up now in case there are shortages? Ilsa Saturday #18
We only get 10% of our crude oil from the ME. madville Saturday #19
I remember 5 bucks a gallon orangecrush Saturday #21
I guess the oil companies use it as an excuse to jack prices at the pump. nt Ilsa Saturday #23
You mean it's not supply and demand???? orangecrush Saturday #24
And the expensive oil will be in the pipeline for months after the new oil starts flowing. Swede Saturday #29
Thank you. nt (Phew!) Ilsa Saturday #22
The problem is, there is NO "WE" in this scenario because "our" oil industry is not nationalized AZJonnie Saturday #28
Prices can increase, sure madville Saturday #34
You said "impact" not "shortages" so that's what I was responding to, as prices would be included in "impact" AZJonnie Saturday #36
And I was responding directly to someone madville Saturday #38
All good mate I should've looked closer at the context, I'm just saying what I was responding to AZJonnie Saturday #40
Highly advisable orangecrush Saturday #20
Now ships are avoiding the Red Sea womanofthehills Saturday #32
If Iran ForgedCrank Saturday #41
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Iran Reportedly Closes St...»Reply #21