Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DET

(2,634 posts)
10. Not So Fast
Wed Jun 3, 2026, 11:47 PM
Wednesday

Biden was not diagnosed with prostate cancer until May 2025, long after the election. That was not a factor in the election. The concern at the time was Biden’s mental acuity after the disastrous debate (ironic, given Trump’s obvious longstanding mental health issues). Biden may have been perceived as physically ill at the time of the election, but that was largely a creation of the biased media.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Kamala.... n/t Chemical Bill Wednesday #1
Hillary/Harris 2028. OAITW r.2.0 Wednesday #2
That's a good way to get another Republican president iemanja Wednesday #4
If you read The Conyers Report... Chemical Bill Wednesday #7
And what would their campaign slogan be, "The third time's the charm"? Rob H. 22 hrs ago #15
Also that. nt eppur_se_muova Wednesday #5
He listened to experts, he knew how to delegate, and he had a VP ready to step in Warpy Wednesday #3
I didn't either. LisaL Wednesday #6
Stage IV cancer is worth worrying about mr715 Wednesday #8
Not So Fast DET Wednesday #10
But the cancer was there are was real. mr715 Yesterday #11
Yes, But DET Yesterday #13
I was under the impression that any cancer can affect mental acuity mr715 22 hrs ago #14
Beyond My Pay Grade DET 19 hrs ago #17
Nailed it, DET OAITW r.2.0 Yesterday #12
Plus... Chemical Bill Wednesday #9
I'm sorry but what good did it do? mr715 20 hrs ago #16
I was explaining why I wasn't worried about President Biden. Chemical Bill 18 hrs ago #18
I understand, but "performing well" is poorly defined. mr715 16 hrs ago #19
Have you read The Conyers Report? n/t Chemical Bill 15 hrs ago #21
No mr715 15 hrs ago #22
Please read it before you blame any Democrat. Chemical Bill 15 hrs ago #23
Plus Mad_Machine76 16 hrs ago #20
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why I never worried about...»Reply #10