Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Democratic moderates warn that leaning too far left in midterms sets up presidential loss in 2028 [View all]NH Ethylene
(31,316 posts)32. But they didn't lose last time.
They play dirty and use scare tactics and hot-button social issues.
We need to start off more moderate to WIN. And then lead public opinion - over time - to the point where they support the stances that are now considered to be far left.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
6 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
88 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Democratic moderates warn that leaning too far left in midterms sets up presidential loss in 2028 [View all]
Omaha Steve
16 hrs ago
OP
12 Senators and 34 House members is not a small number. What we have now is what YOU wanted
LuvLoogie
38 min ago
#86
We've been muzzled too long. The sure way to a loss is not taking a stand against these middle of the road ideas
Deuxcents
15 hrs ago
#8
We lose because of the corrupted media. That phrase, 'defund the police' was
travelingthrulife
4 hrs ago
#64
No, activists used the slogan during George Floyd protests. This is easy to look up.
betsuni
17 min ago
#87
And, don't forget to let your inner-bigot shine! Trash Minorities, proclaim your love of Christian Nationalism, and,
Oneironaut
14 hrs ago
#16
So what you want is more Democrats that will vote both for war and for tax cuts for the rich? I think not
pecosbob
13 hrs ago
#29